EAT C-Sharp vs Rega Planar 10

Side-by-side specifications and a plain-English account of the recorded differences. Full profiles: EAT C-Sharp · Rega Planar 10.

Practical differences

Highlighted cells show a lower reference price, support for more listed speeds, or the presence of a convenience feature. They are not an overall score.

The EAT C-Sharp undercuts the Rega Planar 10 by £321 — £4,049 against £4,370.

Both are belt-drive, so that part of the experience should feel similar on either deck: a motor that's mechanically isolated from the platter by an elastic belt, which is the usual route to a quieter noise floor — the default choice across most of hi-fi.

Bottom line: the EAT C-Sharp has the lower reference price; the table shows which documented features change with the £321 gap.

Compare two different decks →