Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2 vs Pro-Ject Classic EVO

Side-by-side specifications and a plain-English account of the recorded differences. Full profiles: Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2 · Pro-Ject Classic EVO.

Practical differences

Highlighted cells show a lower reference price, support for more listed speeds, or the presence of a convenience feature. They are not an overall score.

There's a real gap here: £150 separates them, with the Pro-Ject Classic EVO the pricier of the two.

The mechanics differ too: the Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2 is direct-drive, the Pro-Ject Classic EVO is belt-drive. The Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2 gets instant start-up, rock-steady speed under load, and enough torque to nudge or backspin the record — the reason DJs and scratch decks are built this way.

The Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2 has a built-in phono stage and Bluetooth streaming. Skip the phono stage and you'll need one built into your amp, or a separate box, to play through normal speakers.

Bottom line: £150 separates these reference prices. That difference is factual; this specification comparison does not assign an overall winner.

Compare two different decks →