Bang & Olufsen Beogram 4000/4002 vs Technics SL-1210MK2

Side-by-side specifications and a plain-English account of the recorded differences. Full profiles: Bang & Olufsen Beogram 4000/4002 · Technics SL-1210MK2.

Practical differences

Highlighted cells show a lower reference price, support for more listed speeds, or the presence of a convenience feature. They are not an overall score.

On price alone the Bang & Olufsen Beogram 4000/4002 costs less, coming in £50 (about 8%) below the Technics SL-1210MK2.

The Bang & Olufsen Beogram 4000/4002 spins its platter via belt drive; the Technics SL-1210MK2 uses direct drive instead. Neither is objectively better — a motor that's mechanically isolated from the platter by an elastic belt, which is the usual route to a quieter noise floor — the default choice across most of hi-fi versus instant start-up, rock-steady speed under load, and enough torque to nudge or backspin the record — the reason DJs and scratch decks are built this way.

The Bang & Olufsen Beogram 4000/4002 is fully automatic — press start and the arm cues itself and lifts at the end of the side — where the Technics SL-1210MK2 needs you to cue the arm by hand.

Bottom line: the Bang & Olufsen Beogram 4000/4002 has the lower reference price; the table shows which documented features change with the £50 gap.

Compare two different decks →