Audio-Technica AT-LP2022 vs Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2

Side-by-side specifications and a plain-English account of the recorded differences. Full profiles: Audio-Technica AT-LP2022 · Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2.

Practical differences

Highlighted cells show a lower reference price, support for more listed speeds, or the presence of a convenience feature. They are not an overall score.

On price alone the Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2 costs less, coming in £1 (about 0%) below the Audio-Technica AT-LP2022, bearing in mind one figure is a current RRP and the other a typical used price that moves with condition.

The Audio-Technica AT-LP2022 spins its platter via belt drive; the Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2 uses direct drive instead. Neither is objectively better — a motor that's mechanically isolated from the platter by an elastic belt, which is the usual route to a quieter noise floor — the default choice across most of hi-fi versus instant start-up, rock-steady speed under load, and enough torque to nudge or backspin the record — the reason DJs and scratch decks are built this way.

The Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2 has a built-in phono stage and Bluetooth streaming. Skip the phono stage and you'll need one built into your amp, or a separate box, to play through normal speakers.

The Audio-Technica AT-LP2022 is discontinued, so that side of this comparison is really "used Audio-Technica AT-LP2022 vs new Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2" — factor in condition, service history and the lack of a warranty against a fresh unit with manufacturer support.

Bottom line: the Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2 has the lower reference price; the table shows which documented features change with the £1 gap.

Compare two different decks →