Fluance RT82 vs Yamaha TT-S303

Side-by-side specifications and a plain-English account of the recorded differences. Full profiles: Fluance RT82 · Yamaha TT-S303.

Practical differences

Highlighted cells show a lower reference price, support for more listed speeds, or the presence of a convenience feature. They are not an overall score.

On price alone the Fluance RT82 costs less, coming in £30 (about 10%) below the Yamaha TT-S303.

Both are belt-drive, so that part of the experience should feel similar on either deck: a motor that's mechanically isolated from the platter by an elastic belt, which is the usual route to a quieter noise floor — the default choice across most of hi-fi.

The Yamaha TT-S303 has a built-in phono stage. Skip the phono stage and you'll need one built into your amp, or a separate box, to play through normal speakers.

Operation differs: the Fluance RT82 is semi-automatic, the Yamaha TT-S303 is manual.

Bottom line: the Fluance RT82 has the lower reference price; the table shows which documented features change with the £30 gap.

Compare two different decks →