Dual 1229 vs Thorens TD 145

Side-by-side specifications and a plain-English account of the recorded differences. Full profiles: Dual 1229 · Thorens TD 145.

Comparison of Dual 1229 and Thorens TD 145
Specification Dual
1229
Thorens
TD 145
PriceHighlighted difference. £180 (used)£200 (used)
CategoryVintageVintage
Statusdiscontinueddiscontinued
Years1972–19741974–?
Driveidler drivebelt drive
SpeedsHighlighted difference. 33/45/78 rpm33/45 rpm
Operationfully-automaticsemi-automatic
Cartridge suppliedNoneNone
Phono stageNoNo
USB outputNoNo
BluetoothNoNo
Platternon-magnetic, dynamically balanced (approx 3 kg class)zinc-alloy, two-piece
TonearmDual gimballed armThorens TP-16
Wow & flutter

Practical differences

Highlighted cells show a lower reference price, support for more listed speeds, or the presence of a convenience feature. They are not an overall score.

On price alone the Dual 1229 costs less, coming in £20 (about 11%) below the Thorens TD 145.

The mechanics differ too: the Dual 1229 is idler-drive, the Thorens TD 145 is belt-drive.

The Dual 1229 is fully automatic — press start and the arm cues itself and lifts at the end of the side — where the Thorens TD 145 needs you to cue the arm by hand.

Bottom line: £20 separates these reference prices. That difference is factual; this specification comparison does not assign an overall winner.

Merchant searches

2 UK merchants handle used or discontinued decks like this — each outbound link searches the deck on that merchant’s site.

Merchants selling Dual 1229
MerchantTypeDeliveryProduct search
eBay UK used marketplace Varies by seller Search at eBay UK ↗
Vinyl Revival music retail UK delivery Search at Vinyl Revival ↗

Merchant searches

2 UK merchants handle used or discontinued decks like this — each outbound link searches the deck on that merchant’s site.

Merchants selling Thorens TD 145
MerchantTypeDeliveryProduct search
eBay UK used marketplace Varies by seller Search at eBay UK ↗
Vinyl Revival music retail UK delivery Search at Vinyl Revival ↗

Compare two different decks →